Self-Consistency Poem Evaluation

Generate three independent evaluations of my poem, then synthesize the consensus.

Poem:
{{poem}}

**Evaluation 1 (Technical Lens):**
Assess craft: meter, sound, form, structure, language precision

**Evaluation 2 (Emotional Lens):**
Assess impact: does it move? surprise? resonate? Where does it connect or fail?

**Evaluation 3 (Reader Lens):**
Assess accessibility: can a reader enter? Is there a clear entry point? Does it reward attention?

**Synthesis:**
Where do all three evaluations agree? Where do they diverge?
What revisions would satisfy all three perspectives?

Prioritize the improvements with highest cross-evaluation agreement.