Evaluate whether voice-over is justified for this story: Story: {{story_summary}} Proposed Voice-Over Usage: {{proposed_usage}} Genre: {{genre}} Voice-Over Audit: 1. NECESSITY TEST - Can this information be shown instead of told? - What would be lost without voice-over? - Is it a crutch or a choice? 2. FUNCTION EVALUATION - Ironic counterpoint to image? - Access to internal state impossible to show? - Time compression? - Thematic commentary? - Unreliable narrator effect? 3. ALTERNATIVES EXPLORED - Rewrite key moments without voice-over - What visual/behavioral solutions exist? 4. IF VOICE-OVER IS JUSTIFIED - What is the voice (character, perspective, tense)? - Where does it appear and disappear? - How is it distinct from dialogue? 5. SAMPLE COMPARISON - Write a scene with voice-over - Write the same scene without - Which is stronger and why? Recommend: Use voice-over / Find alternative / Hybrid approach
Voice-Over Justification Analysis
Rigorously evaluate voice-over usage to ensure it enhances rather than crutches storytelling.
18 copies0 forks
Share this prompt:
Details
Category
AnalysisUse Cases
voice-over decisionscraft evaluationalternative solutions
Works Best With
gpt-4oclaude-sonnet-4-20250514
Created Updated Shared