Evaluate my product decision for {{decision}} using multiple perspectives. My proposed decision: {{proposed_decision}} Context: {{context}} Data available: {{data}} **Self-Assessment Framework:** **1. Devil Advocate Check** - What is the strongest argument against my decision? - What am I potentially wrong about? - What would a smart critic say? **2. Inversion Analysis** - What would make this decision terrible? - Am I avoiding those failure modes? **3. Pre-mortem** - Imagine this failed spectacularly. Why? - What early warning signs should I watch? **4. Bias Check** - Am I suffering from confirmation bias? - Sunk cost fallacy? - Recency bias? - Authority bias? **5. Stakeholder Perspective** - How would each stakeholder view this? - Whose perspective am I underweighting? **6. Alternative Options** - Did I genuinely consider alternatives? - What would option B look like? **7. Reversibility Assessment** - How reversible is this decision? - What is the cost of being wrong? **8. Intuition vs Data** - Where am I relying on intuition? - Is that appropriate here? **Refined Decision:** - Updated recommendation after reflection - Key validations still needed
Product Intuition Self-Assessment
Challenge your own product decisions with structured self-assessment
37 copies0 forks
Share this prompt:
Details
Category
AnalysisUse Cases
Decision validationBias checkingCritical thinking
Works Best With
gpt-4claude-3
Created Updated Shared