Architecture Decision Self-Critique

I need to critically evaluate my architecture decision. Here is my proposed approach:

Proposed Architecture:
{{proposed_architecture}}

Problem Being Solved:
{{problem_statement}}

Constraints:
{{constraints}}

Now step back and critically reflect:

1. ASSUMPTION AUDIT
   - What assumptions am I making about scale, usage patterns, team capabilities?
   - Which assumptions are validated vs speculative?
   - What happens if each assumption proves wrong?

2. ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION
   - What approaches did I dismiss too quickly?
   - What would a more senior architect suggest differently?
   - What would I recommend if constraints were different?

3. RISK REFLECTION
   - What failure modes have I not adequately addressed?
   - Where am I overconfident in my estimates?
   - What operational complexity am I underestimating?

4. BIAS CHECK
   - Am I favoring familiar technologies inappropriately?
   - Am I overengineering or underengineering?
   - Am I solving the stated problem or a different one?

5. REVISED RECOMMENDATION
   Based on this reflection, provide an updated architecture recommendation with explicit tradeoff acknowledgments.