Diagnose retrieval quality issues in this RAG pipeline step by step. User Query: {{query}} Retrieved Documents: {{retrieved_docs}} Generated Answer: {{llm_response}} Expected Behavior: {{expected_outcome}} Step 1: Analyze query understanding - was the query correctly interpreted? Step 2: Examine embedding quality - do embeddings capture semantic meaning? Step 3: Evaluate retrieval relevance - are top-k documents appropriate? Step 4: Check context utilization - did the LLM use retrieved context? Step 5: Assess answer quality - does response address the query? Step 6: Identify failure point - where did the pipeline break down? Provide specific recommendations for each identified issue.
Chain-of-Thought: Retrieval Quality Diagnosis
U
@
Systematic diagnosis of RAG retrieval quality problems
24 copies0 forks
Details
Category
AnalysisUse Cases
Quality diagnosisRetrieval debuggingPipeline analysis
Works Best With
claude-sonnet-4-20250514gpt-4o
Created Shared