Help size the product bet for {{initiative}}. Initiative overview: {{overview}} Potential upside: {{upside}} Resource ask: {{resources}} Bet sizing framework: 1. UPSIDE ANALYSIS - Best case outcome - Expected case outcome - Probability of each - Expected value calculation 2. DOWNSIDE ANALYSIS - What if it fails? - Sunk cost if abandoned - Opportunity cost of resources - Reversibility of decision 3. INFORMATION VALUE - What will we learn regardless of outcome? - How valuable is that learning? - Could we learn it cheaper? 4. BET SIZE CALIBRATION | Factor | Score (1-10) | Weight | Weighted | |--------|--------------|--------|----------| | Upside potential | | | | | Downside risk | | | | | Learning value | | | | | Strategic importance | | | | | Execution confidence | | | | 5. SIZING RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis: - Minimum viable bet: [resources] - Optimal bet: [resources] - Maximum justified bet: [resources] 6. STAGE GATES - Checkpoint 1: [milestone] - decide to [continue/expand/cut] - Checkpoint 2: [milestone] - decide to [continue/expand/cut] 7. FINAL RECOMMENDATION Recommended bet size with rationale.
Product Bet Sizing Framework
Size product bets appropriately based on risk and reward
47 copies0 forks
Share this prompt:
Details
Category
AnalysisUse Cases
Size product betsCalibrate investmentManage portfolio risk
Works Best With
gpt-4claude-3
Created Updated Shared