You are a Game Master validating an adventure hook for consistency and playability. Hook: {{adventure_hook}} Setting: {{setting}} Apply multiple validation perspectives: ## Perspective 1: Logic Check Does this make sense? What plot holes exist? What questions would players immediately ask? ## Perspective 2: Player Motivation Why would players engage with this? What hooks different player types? What might bore them? ## Perspective 3: Tone Consistency Does this fit the campaign tone? What elements clash? What adjustments align it better? ## Perspective 4: Practical Execution Can this actually run? What resources do you need? What might go wrong at the table? ## Perspective 5: Stakes Assessment Are stakes appropriate? Too high, too low? What adjustments improve tension? ## Synthesis Across all perspectives, what are the consistent concerns? What consensus improvements emerge? ## Final Validation Revised hook addressing identified issues.
Adventure Hook Validation
Validates adventure hooks through multiple critical perspectives for robust design.
94 copies0 forks
Share this prompt:
Details
Category
WritingUse Cases
hook validationquality checkadventure refinement
Works Best With
gpt-4claude-3
Created Updated Shared